May 25, 2013

Stop Cancer in Dogs: Shut Down the Animal Welfare Community

Save Our Dogs

Everybody has an agenda.

Mine is that you don’t lose your dog the way I lost Murphy: to a cancer linked to early spay/neuter. Make my agenda yours: let’s save our dogs’ lives.

Join me: let’s take down the animal welfare community as it currently exists.

End it. Stop it. Put it out of business.

All of them. The veterinary community. The animal welfare organizations, from our local shelters and rescues to national organizations like the Humane Society and Best Friends. Breeders. The irresponsible owners who produce the mixed-breed dogs who have helped our shelter/rescue system become the new puppy millers.

Rebuild it so all of them become our partners in creating healthy multi-species families.

Got your attention?

Did you know that 50% of dogs over 10 will die from cancer?

Murphy was a week shy of 13 years, 8 months.

She died from a cancer linked to early spay/neuter, like other cancers, as well as thyroid disease, obesity, and arthritis.

Do you know what the research shows?

  • Take female dogs through at least two heat cycles.
  • There is almost no reason to ever neuter a male dog.

Why? Because we don’t know what interrupting the hormonal development of maturing animals does, but we can now clearly see what happens when we do.

The animal welfare community knows this! They are ignoring it! The statistics are out there. Their silence is killing our dogs!

Many of these people know better. Their voices are either silenced or drowned out by ignorance and politics. Bad thinking that says we must spay/neuter to prevent overpopulation because people won’t be responsible later or because it controls aggression. Bad thinking that insists somebody else should tell you how to live with your animal families. Dangerous thinking, because it is clearly wrong.

Yes, cancers can come from not spaying or neutering, and from other things, like environmental toxins, genetics, over-vaccination, and bad luck. It’s a delicate balance, and the answer shouldn’t rest in the hands of our paternalistic, simplistic, brainwashed animal welfare community. The answer rests in our hands.

Make them accountable. Make yourselves accountable. Here’s how you start:

  • Refuse. Refuse to buy or take any animal from anyone, shelter or breeder, who insists on spay/neuter before adoption. Refuse to adopt any animal who has been spayed or neutered early. Whether or when your next animal is spayed or neutered, it should be a decision you make with a trusted vet. If we were going to solve the problem of pet overpopulation by early spay/neuter it would have happened already. Instead, we have an epidemic of life-threatening and life-ending diseases, like cancer. The practice will stop if you don’t buy into it.
  • Hire. Find a veterinarian who will discuss early spay/neuter with you and help you come to a wise decision. Stick with that vet and refer business to them.
  • Educate. Learn what the issues are, including cancer. Tell everyone you know who has an animal, wants one, or trades in animals (that includes breeders, veterinary facilities, shelter and rescue organizations, and the irresponsible people who breed the dogs who end up at shelters). The arguments about aggression and overpopulation are ignorant. People mean well but they simply don’t know any better. Learn about the issues. Then teach them.
  • Discuss. Debate the issues calmly, rationally, respectfully. It’s the only way we’ll create new guidelines that will help our dogs. And us.
  • Research. Get them funding and conducting the research that will fight these diseases while clearly identifying what causes them, and why. Do your own research: read up on it starting with this article.
  • Love. Good policy comes from wide open loving hearts. Keep clear and balanced. Refuse to fall into the traps of fear spread by current animal welfare policies.

When cancer is linked to something that we thought all along was responsible, like early spay/neuter, then we need to stop the practice, counsel and educate all involved, and conduct the research to find a solution. Then we need to apply the solutions, even if it’s on an individual basis, dog by dog.

Here’s one strange argument: vets have been doing early spay/neuter for some years on dogs as young as six weeks, and they insist on doing it by six months. They say the dogs are fine. But are they? The dogs may have done well in surgery, but who’s tracking what happens to them during their lives? Cancer is epidemic in our country. Reasonable, smart people are worried about the link between early spay/neuter and serious health and behavior issues in our dogs. Think about it!

Make the animal welfare community do the right thing: force them off the early spay/neuter bandwagon.

If you don’t do business with these people, they won’t be in business. If that’s what it takes, let’s do it.

Now.

Wise, responsible, caring choice is how we live the human-animal bond. Don’t let it die like Murphy did.

Life is too precious to waste. Love is too important to lose.

Take a good look: Murphy’s isn’t the face of the last dog who dies from splenic cancer. But maybe hers can be the face that helps us stop it.

Help me. Save our dogs.

© 2012 Robyn M Fritz

Chiropractic Care Isn’t just for People … or Dogs

Some days you’re just goofing off and you find news about somebody who makes a difference. This one is ironic to me, since it deals with chiropractic care, this time for race horses, in particular, for 2012 Kentucky Derby winner I’ll Have Another.

Here’s a link to the article, “Equine Chiropractic Asset to O’Neill Team,” just published in thebloodhorse.com. It profiles Larry Jones, a chiropractor who works exclusively with race horses. Jones’ philosophy is that a lot of physical problems in race horses, especially back issues, can be treated more successfully chiropractically than with medications. It’s his life’s work—a calling and a business.

A lot of people dismiss chiropractic, like they dismiss other holistic modalities, including diet and exercise. So they patchwork a problem. Give a drug for pain. Take some time off to recover. Prey on suffering people with the latest miracle cure.

Sometimes that works. Well, not the miracle cure bit, but you get the idea.

I personally have had better luck in my own life with chiropractic than with most other modalities I’ve tried. My dog, Murphy, also benefited from chiropractic care off and on during her life. And acupuncture, Chinese herbs, diet, drugs, and laughs. I had to work hard to find out what worked for her, and my other animals, Alki and Grace the Cat.

I’ve had to work hard to find solutions for myself, too. Why? Because our current medical system doesn’t like anything that doesn’t benefit a big drug or hospital or insurance company. They’d rather you take a drug, which can mess with your body, than have a chiropractic treatment that both resolves the issue and makes your body, and your mind, feel better.

Case in point: I’ve worked very hard to get well and stay well. Years of work. Now my insurance company doesn’t want to cover a $59 chiropractic bill for anything, including a migraine. They’d rather I pay $100 a dose for a pill. This infuriates me and makes my chiropractor boil. And it should. If we have to pay for health insurance, we should get coverage for what works for us, and not for what some unknown person thinks should work.

So I credit Doug O’Neill for an enlightened approach to his stable’s care. Winning the Kentucky Derby didn’t prove that equine chiropractic care works. But since a winning horse benefited by it, maybe other trainers will look at it for their horses’ care.

After all, we all get out of whack on occasion, and chiropractic works.

Health insurance, not so much.

© 2012 Robyn M Fritz

Cloning Dogs: Grief Doesn’t Make It Work

my dying dogWould I clone this dog?

In a heartbeat—if it worked. But it doesn’t. At any price.

Cloning our animal companions is in the news these days, stories of people paying upwards of $150,000 to clone their deceased dog or cat.

I just sigh. What are these people thinking?

Actually, I know what they’re thinking. They’re grief-stricken, mourning the loss of a beloved animal companion. Just like anyone mourns the loss of anyone they love. They just want them back.

I mourn this dog: my beloved Cavalier King Charles spaniel, Murphy, died March 8, just two months ago. She was a week shy of 13 years, 8 months. Forever would not have been long enough with Murphy, but she’s gone. And cloning her won’t bring her back: cloning never brings anyone back.

Here’s why.

Scientists are obsessed with replicating genetic material, so they can say they’ve cloned the animal. It’s supposedly an exact genetic duplicate. Well, barring the problems of mutations and other serious effects of cloning (we just aren’t superior to nature), genes are genes. So what? 

Genes are not personalities. And they are not souls.

So the people who clone their animals may get a genetic match, but it is not their dog come back to them. It may look like them, but it won’t be the same personality. It won’t be the same soul. The way life works that isn’t possible, at least scientifically.

Now I’m not going to say to run off to a shelter and adopt a dog, because that’s not how it works, either. I will say that you should find a heart match between you and your next dog, whether you find it from a breeder or a shelter/rescue organization. Sometimes you have to look hard for it.

But you won’t find it in a laboratory.

Here’s the thing people miss in the whole cloning argument: grief and longing create new dogs from dead ones, because we’ve allowed fear to rule us. Love finds a way to move on, to have new relationships, to stay healthy and balanced. Yes, it’s possible to love an entirely different dog just as much as you did the lost dog. I know. I’ve been lucky that way.

With cloning you’re trying to freeze time: understandable, because loss is devastating. But cloning comes from fear: we simply can’t let go and move on. Fear damages us psychologically and emotionally, because we actually step out of life and into memory. Maybe that’s too philosophical, but think about it: as we recreate the past, how are we living right now, and how much does that stifle our future?

To the point: cloning will never duplicate the same dog.

As a professional intuitive I help people explore relationship and business issues, find balance and healing, and talk with all life, including the dead.

When someone dies, they move on. Literally. If they come back, and they can and do, their soul inhabits a new body, because that’s what we do on this planet, we play with different bodies. We can’t create that body, because creation is the soul’s choice, not ours. The personality that accompanies that soul is different: so you may get a physical genetic duplicate, maybe even the same soul willing to come back (science has no control over that), but not the same personality. Cloning doesn’t bring the soul and personality back, just the genes.

Case in point. The soul that was Murphy is a very active soul. It is also the soul of my second dog, Alki. And it’s been the soul in many other bodies, currently and in the past, with me and other people. I’m not just talking reincarnation here, although that’s part of it. I’m talking a soul being in multiple bodies at the same time (or none, because it’s decided to rest).

So, Murphy and Alki are the same soul in two different bodies (well, until Murphy died). The same breed of dog. But strikingly different personalities. Because I’m experienced with this soul’s reincarnations, and with those of others I meet, I know that cloning their physical bodies wouldn’t duplicate their soul or personality.

Think about it. If you consciously chose to come back again in a body, would you choose the exact same body or personality to be in that lifetime?

Yes, we’re into metaphysics here, but that’s what science is trying to do in cloning. Science can create a body, but not a soul or personality.

And believe me, it’s the soul, and especially the personality, we miss when we’re gung ho for cloning.

The only way to get that soul back is to ask it to come back and, if it agrees, to find the body it comes back in. In fact, in my practice, I often see the same soul reincarnating in family groups (not always happily, but that’s another issue), so that isn’t as hard as, well, cloning. Honest.

Fair warning, though: you may want your dog’s soul back, but it may choose a different personality, and even species, meaning it could come back as a cat, if at all. It happens all the time.

So save yourself the money, and the grief. Find a new animal to love, if you’re up to it. A heart match.

Cloning your dog won’t bring your dog back. It might make a nice copy. But it won’t be the original. That only comes around once.

© 2012 Robyn M Fritz

 

Why the New iPhone Commercials Fail

I actually have an iPhone. I got a smartphone for my business so I can take credit cards at public events. I wanted the easiest phone to use, and an easy-on-the-eyes background.

Then I discovered you can make phone calls with the iPhone, and if you’re lost and know the tool is there, you can even find yourself on the phone, and possibly get un-lost, if that’s even a condition. I even downloaded a song to play in a workshop I teach.

The iPhone is brilliant. I now understand why people like technology.

So why is the phone’s new TV campaign so poorly done?

So far I’ve seen two commercials. Each star a person—and their phone. In each, the person, one a woman, the other a man, seem engaging, dynamic, successful, and interested.

But they are having a relationship with their phone. They not only like it: they smugly relish it.

Did you notice that there are no other humans in these commercials? One lone human and their talking phone? Doesn’t that just creep you out?

Here’s a better idea: have a commercial in which different people talk to each other about something, sending directions, restaurant ideas, sight-seeing, whatever, but doing it together, all made easier by technology.

But let’s not have technology replace human interaction.

Oh, wait, we already did that. Let’s take it back. Stat.

(c) 2012 Robyn M Fritz